Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's 87.9 global score. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's, but it's also heavier.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.