Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | -- |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a 91.1 score against 87.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition body is just a little bit heavier but way thinner than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen, a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels and a really brighter screen. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.