Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's global score of 78.2. Although it's the best phone we compare here, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is older, heavier and a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a brighter display and a quite greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, they both have a camera in the back with a 64 mega-pixels. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.