Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 87.9 score against 76.6. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it is a little bit heavier. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way better video definition, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.