Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with an 87.9 score against 79. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's just a bit heavier. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have a greater amount of pixels per inch of display, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a same size display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.