Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-27 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a score of 87.3, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Xiaomi Poco F3's design is newer, a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F3 has an older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit higher screen density. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Poco F3 feature really similar processors, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco F3, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much better video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.