Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-27 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Sonic silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a score of 87.3, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F3 has newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features. The Xiaomi Poco F3 is a lighter and thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, although both were only released 7 months apart.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a little better processing power than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Poco F3 has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a much brighter display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little greater screen pixels density.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Xiaomi Poco F3 one, both have equal internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher video definition, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 0% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.