Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Poco F3, with a score of 97.6 against 87.3. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Poco F3 has Android 11 version, providing you lots of additional features. Even though the Galaxy Fold is older and noticeably heavier than Xiaomi Poco F3, it's construction is still thinner.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a little better processing power than Galaxy Fold, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh. The Xiaomi Poco F3 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.