Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-27 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 87.3 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Poco F3's construction is extremely newer and way thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's a bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has much lower brightness and a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a better processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size. Xiaomi Poco F3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.