Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a global score of 87.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F3 has 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Poco F3's design is newer, notably thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F3 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a way worse quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a much larger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels camera. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.