Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F3, with an 88.5 score against 87.3. Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco F3, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit lighter and a little thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco F3 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a bit better processor than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit worse display pixels density, they both have a display with the same size.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy Z Flip has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.