Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-27 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 has an overall score of 87.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's global score of 85.6. Xiaomi Poco F3's design is thicker and a little bit heavier than Galaxy Z Flip 3. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Xiaomi Poco F3 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit worse screen density, they both have a display with the same size. Xiaomi Poco F3 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 have very similar memory to install games and applications, they have the same internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F3 has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.