Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco F3, getting a 94.6 score against 87.3. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Poco F3 were released only 6 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is heavier but somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco F3.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a processor that is very similar to the CPU in Xiaomi Poco F3, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a lower image and video quality and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 0 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.