Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-26 | 2017-11-03 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, getting a score of 88.1 against 74.6. IPhone X counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone X features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit greater number of pixels in each display inch.
The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT takes better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
IPhone X features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has a very superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.