Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-26 | 2018-10-26 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT's overall score of 74.6. The iPhone XR counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XR features a bit better display than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution, a little smaller screen and a bit less pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi POCO F4 GT features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. Xiaomi POCO F4 GT counts with a better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.