Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-26 | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT's score of 74.6. The LG Velvet counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bit better pixel count per inch in the display.
The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a way better performance than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi POCO F4 GT shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT also counts with faster video frame rate and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi POCO F4 GT counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.