Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-26 | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, having a overall score of 83.8 against 74.6. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a really superior performance than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A50 features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi POCO F4 GT features better battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Xiaomi POCO F4 GT captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, it also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.