Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-26 | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, with a overall score of 85.5 against 74.6. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a bit better pixels count per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.