Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-26 | 2015-08-21 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, with an 80.2 score against 74.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a really superior performance than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT also has higher 60 fps video frame rates and a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi POCO F4 GT features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.