Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-26 | 2016-06-10 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, having a 75.8 score against 74.6. Galaxy S7 Active has an extremely better processor than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Xiaomi POCO F4 GT counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.