Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT's overall score of 74.6. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has Android 12. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bit bigger display. Xiaomi POCO F4 GT captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi POCO F4 GT counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 4% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.