Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-26 | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT's general score of 74.6. These phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has Android 12 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior CPU than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT. Both of them have a screen of the same size, the same screen density and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.9 aperture and a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.