Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-26 | 2020-03-30 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (940 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 11 has a global score of 76, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F4 GT's 74.6 score. These phones include Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 11 has older 10 version while Xiaomi POCO F4 GT has Android 12 version. ZTE Axon 11 counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each display inch.
ZTE Axon 11 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. ZTE Axon 11 features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F4 GT, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
The Xiaomi POCO F4 GT captures way better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 11. Both of them have the same resolution camera in the back, a F1.9 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution. Xiaomi POCO F4 GT features longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 11, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.