Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-23 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F4, having a overall score of 88.1 against 87.5. Apple iPhone X is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco F4, but both of them are equally thin. IPhone X counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and way more brightness. The Xiaomi Poco F4 shoots better photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and a back camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F4 has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 66% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.