Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-06-23 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a global score of 87.5 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and noticeably thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F4 has 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a processor that is very similar to the Xiaomi Poco F4 one, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Poco F4 features a better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit higher display density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Poco F4 feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a much lower 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a way better video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.