Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-23 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having an 87.5 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Poco F4 is a extremely newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, although it is just a little bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has much lower brightness and a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F4 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.