Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-06-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a general score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F4 has an older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Poco F4 design is extremely newer, noticeably lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Xiaomi Poco F4 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a way lower display density, it also counts with a lot larger screen. The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F4 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Poco F4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.