Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a score of 87.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F4 has a more recent 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, providing the user some nice extra features. The Xiaomi Poco F4 body is much newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Xiaomi Poco F4 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.