Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-06-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco F4, with a score of 90.6 against 87.5. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F4 has Android 12. Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco F4, but it's a lot heavier and was released just 11 months before.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 features a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco F4 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.