Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-09 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's overall score of 79.5. The iPhone XS is an incredibly older phone than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. IPhone XS features a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a bit better display than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a bigger display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a much brighter screen and a little bit better pixel number per inch of screen. The Apple iPhone XS features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 94 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.