Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's overall score of 79.5. LG V35 ThinQ's body is thinner and notably lighter than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it was released many years before. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a much longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a much lower 16 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.