Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, having a general score of 87.1 against 79.5. LG Velvet is an way older phone than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but it is a little thinner and lighter anyway. LG Velvet features an extremely better processor than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a better quantity of pixels per screen inch. The LG Velvet has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh. LG Velvet captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.