Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 524 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, getting a global score of 86.2 against 79.5. Motorola Moto G200 5G's construction is just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it's just a little thicker and was released around 18 months before. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Moto G200 5G features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Moto G200 5G captures greater videos and photos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a bit better battery life than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.