Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-09 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's overall score of 79.5. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features a really superior processing power than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5160mAh battery size. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.