Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 79.5. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an incredibly older phone than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but it is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a greater pixel count per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Galaxy A51 features a really superior performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has longer battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 features a superior camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture and a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.