Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 524 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's 79.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy M51 construction is older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13 version.
Galaxy M51 counts with a much better performing processor than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a better pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Galaxy M51 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro. They have a same resolution camera and the same camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M51 has a superior battery duration than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.