Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, having a 98.9 score against 79.5. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much older and just a little bit heavier device than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it a bit thinner anyway. Both devices in this review include the same Android 13 OS.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per display inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.