Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a general score of 79.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's construction is much newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a just a bit better screen density, a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has 7 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 72 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos and a way less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.