Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-09 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is slightly better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 79.5. The Galaxy S9 design is just a little thinner and a lot lighter than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger display.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 72 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.