Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's score of 79.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is thinner and lighter than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite higher pixels density. The Galaxy Z Flip features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip shoots slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.