Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, with a 92.3 score against 79.5. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way older than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro also has a little higher pixels amount per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 56% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.