Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-09 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 725 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the Xiaomi Poco F5, with an 88.1 score against 78.2. Apple iPhone X's construction is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco F5, even though it was released 6 years before. The Apple iPhone X features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has a little bit smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The iPhone X has a much better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone X and Xiaomi Poco F5 both have quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F5 has a really longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent more battery size. IPhone X shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.