Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-09 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 725 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco F5's general score of 78.2. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an extremely older and just a bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Poco F5, but Samsung made it a little thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F5 has Android 13 version.
Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, they both have a display of the same size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better performance than Xiaomi Poco F5. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as Xiaomi Poco F5's one, they have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F5 features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.