Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 78.7. Despite of the fact that iPhone X is incredibly older than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. IPhone X counts with a better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The iPhone X has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The iPhone X counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.