Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's score of 78.7. Google Pixel is an incredibly older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but it is way lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel features a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a larger number of cores (and faster).
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture and a lot better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.