Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with an 80 score against 78.7. Google Pixel 3's design is thinner and way lighter than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just 21 months before. Google Pixel 3 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.