Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a score of 78.8 against 78.7. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 3a is older than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's design is just a little thinner and a lot lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 3a has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.