Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is way lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit more than a year before.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3a XL. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Google Pixel 3a XL and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro have really similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video quality and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a camera with a way higher resolution. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.