Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having a score of 81.9 against 78.7. Google Pixel 4 is a a bit thinner and way lighter phone than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even when they were only released 9 months apart. Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.