Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's score of 78.7. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter device than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.